Reprinted from SAPA News Service (South Africa) 13 July 2000
Dirty Tricks Infect Drug Campaign

“They came to my room and wanted to see my speech. They said I must start it with a strong statement on retroviral drugs. When I refused, they suggested that I cut it by half…”

===

Evidence of dirty tricks in the drug campaign emerged on Wednesday after a top pharmaceutical company admitted to funding an activist group that has been aggressively lobbying for greater access to drugs to treat the disease.

The revelation came to the fore after activists from a group called Act-Up ( Coalition to Unleash Power) staged a demonstration at the stall of pharmaceutical company Boehringer Ingelheim at the 13th International Conference in Durban on Wednesday afternoon.

After a vocal altercation with conference organizers, members of the group moved to the stall of another pharmaceutical company, Merck Sharpe and Dome (MSD). Here, the company’s executive director of public affairs, Geoffrey Sturchio, admitted the company funded Act-Up.

People shouldn’t be naďve about activists groups. Boerhringer-Ingelheim, who manufacture drug Nevirapene, compete with MSD, who manufacture the drug Crixivan. Both are major sponsors of the Durban conference.

In the past few days, members of Act-Up disrupted several meetings at the conference, demanding that the South African government supply anti-retrovirals to pregnant women. They were also vocal at the opening ceremony of the conference.

A collaboration between MSD and Act-Up was also uncovered at the 12th International conference in Geneva, when security personnel admitted to a journalist Alex Russel that the two had collaborated to stage an aggressive publicity stunt at the company’s booth.

Act-Up were in the news again two years ago, when certain branches of the movement broke away from the central body to campaign against the use of anti-retrovirals. The breakaway group said the drugs caused severe side effects and did more harm than good

Science writer and consultant Anita Allen said people shouldn’t be naďve about the role some activists groups and non-governmental organizations play in the drug campaign.

“What better advertisement than to have people shouting passionately for your drug with the company logo in the background?” Allen asked.

The South African government has come under great pressure from activists, the media, the public and pharmaceutical companies to supply drugs like Nevirapine and AZT free of charge.

Government has resisted the calls, saying the drugs could be harmful and are too expensive.

Stakes in the business are high. Sales from AZT alone doubled the turnover of pharmaceutical company Glaxo Welllcome within five years after receiving a license to sell the drug.

A doctor, who did not want to be named and who is a speaker at the Durban conference, said government policy was often defined by recommendations compiled after conferences and panel discussions on the disease.

He said he had been under pressure to alter his speech to a more drug-prone stance at the second meeting of president Thabo Mbeki’s advisory panel earlier in July.

“They came to my room and wanted to see my speech. They said I must start it with a strong statement on retroviral drugs. When I refused, they suggested that I cut my speech by half so that someone else could speak.

“Again, I refused. They were obviously terrified about what I was going to say,” the doctor said.

The doctor, who has been treating patients since before 1984, said he felt the role of drugs in combating the disease was exaggerated. Dosages of drugs used to fight the disease, he said, were often too high.

“AZT has probably killed more people than it saved. If it came to a choice between giving Africa drugs or food and water, I’d have no hesitation, give them food and water,” he said.

Doctor Helen Gayle, from the Centers for Disease Control, who was implicated in manipulating the doctor’s speech, denied knowledge of the incident.

She said everyone at the panel spoke independently and of their own free will. Later however, she admitted to hearing rumors of the incident, but said she felt doctors had misunderstood the situation.


Reprinted from SAPA News Service (South Africa) 13 July 2000

FAQ's

References

to Africa In Perspective Related Articles - HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa Not Explained by Sexual Transmission

to Mothers, Babies & AIDS